Assessment+Criteria


 * Assessment Criteria ||
 * Excelling || * Project is investigative, creative and may be original in design (has the X factor)
 * Clearly shows scientific method in use of controls and variables
 * Project shows depth of investigation, multiple fair testing and conditions
 * Conclusion is an in-depth and detailed analysis of data/results
 * Experiment has a purposeful future application and this can be articulated
 * Superb presentation, indicating an outstanding amount of effort and planning
 * Able to explain the scientific process and principles that underpin the investigation ||
 * Extending || * Project is designed to thoroughly investigate a hypothesis
 * Shows scientific procedure with multiple fair testing and variables
 * All aspecs of the scientific process are able to be explained and documented
 * Conclusion includes in-depth analysis and interpretation of data/results
 * Excellent presentation which indicates a high level of effort and planning ||
 * Achieving || * Project is designed to investigate a hypothesis
 * Shows scientific procedure with fair tesing and variables
 * Conclusion includes some analysis and interpretation of data/results
 * All aspects of the scientific process are on final presentation
 * Presentation indicates a good amount of effort and planning ||
 * Developing || * Simple investigation with minimal testing
 * Limited analysis of results, with no or few conclusions made from data
 * Most aspects of the scientific process are present on the final presentation
 * Show some scientific method through investigation
 * Presentation indicates limited effort and planning ||
 * Emerging || * Project attempted
 * Little scientific method.
 * Minimal planning in materials and equipment. ||
 * Teacher Comment: ||

Home

Thinking and Preparation Planning

Results

Final Presentation Checklist Reflective Journal Application

Assessment Criteria

Useful Sites